Bitperfect 3 1 2

broken image


Highend-AudioPC is a swiss company specialized in High-End Computer Audio Soft- and Hardware. Creators of the award-winning AudiophileOptimizer. Welcome to Bitperfect.top. Welcome to the website of BitPerfect Limited! If you find yourself here, you are definitely in search of reliable and profitable investment. Yes, you are just at the right place! Our company offers trust assets management of the highest quality on the basis of foreign exchange and profitable trade through Bitcoin.

[I asked Dave to write this review as a follow-up to the review of WordPerfect 3.0 that he wrote earlier this year. Dave would like us all to note that his opinions do not necessarily represent those of his employer. Assuming my neck continues to heal nicely, I'll follow up in a few weeks with some thoughts about how WordPerfect 3.1 compares to Word 6. -Tonya]

I recently dug up my review of WordPerfect 3.0 (from TidBITS-205) and read through it, wondering what they've done for me lately. In WordPerfect 3.1, Novell has done quite a bit. In addition to enhancing the program, Novell sped up several features, did not slow down any part of the program that I've noticed, and did not create a disk storage monster.

New Features — The most visible changes to 3.1 are QuickCorrect (an automatic typing corrector) and the new features for System 7.5, which include support for the Drag Manager (exchanging information between files and applications without having to copy and paste), Apple Guide (interactive help), and QuickDraw GX printing (see TidBITS-243 for more about QuickDraw GX) .

I haven't used Drag Manager much, but it seems to work as the manual says: drag a selection out to the desktop and the Mac puts a copy there, available to be dragged into another document (the document could be from WordPerfect of from or any other compliant application).

I have seen the future of computer 'How To' writing, and that future is Apple Guide or its successor. People seem to be of two minds about Apple Guide: some are indifferent; others are drooling at the thought of seeing a really good help system. Being in the latter category, I'll offer the defense that anyone who has done much computer support has run across features they have had to demo time and again. A help system that can walk the user through a process, using a real example of the user's choosing, and explaining the operation while it happens, is truly music to my soul. WordPerfect Guide (the WordPerfect specific files that run under Apple Guide) includes only a subset of topics in the regular help file, but it's a good start. If I could only get Novell to throw out that lousy clone of Microsoft Help they use for the regular help files, I'd be happier. I find Apple Guide a bit too slow on a IIci, but for a beginner it probably isn't too bad.

QuickDraw GX printing makes it much easier to create a program that can handle landscape and portrait pages in the same document. I've been waiting for the ability to include a few landscape pages in a standard portrait document since Apple promised it two years before the original System 7.0 shipped. It finally works, and it's almost enough to justify the extra memory GX takes. People with lots of printer choices on a network will probably appreciate GX printing support. I also think that Hoefler Text (one of the GX fonts Apple includes with System 7.5) represents a definite improvement over the PostScript fonts most of us are used to working with. If Apple can get enough companies to create and support GX fonts, computer typography will take another leap forward. On the other hand, Hoefler Text is kind of tiring to look at on the screen.

QuickCorrect is WordPerfect's name for what I call a typo catcher. It fixes simple things that people mis-type, such as 'teh' instead of 'the', multiple spaces between words, no capitalization at the beginning of a sentence, or an inadvertent second capital letter at the beginning of a word. QuickCorrect isn't a full spelling checker, or it would be way too slow. It does catch little mistakes quite well, in exchange for a slight hesitation in some screen operations.

You can also use QuickCorrect as a mini-glossary. You can edit QuickCorrect's substitution list to include up to 254 characters for any 'word' you want to be shorthand for the longer piece. For example, if you always want to write out 'alternating current' instead of 'ac', just edit the list appropriately.

Native Power Mac support was added in 3.0a last March, and 3.1 adds a fat binary install option. PowerTalk support also existed in a previous version, but I haven't tried it.

Speed — Scrolling is only slightly faster than 3.0a, but screen redraw action is much quicker in normal text entry. If you type in tables on a 68030-based Mac, the screen redraw still gets jerky when the text is being entered in a cell that is right along the edge of the document window. It's sad to see my IIci become the slowpoke of the Mac family, but I still find 3.1 serviceable on the old machine. Novell says 3.1 will run on a Mac Plus under System 6.0.7 in a 2 MB memory partition. I believe it would run, but I'm almost positive I'd use a text editor with a mark-up language before I'd wait for any long document editing on a Plus. Maybe one of these days I'll drag out my Plus and see what it's like.

If you want some numbers (all times in seconds), I'll pick on scrolling and word count for the WordPerfect Read Me file, which has 67 pages and about 19,500 words. In case you're wondering why the file so long, 40 pages are appendices which offer a list of all the command key equivalents, an Apple event dictionary, macro commands, and macro variables. All this information is available online, but not in the bound manual. Apparently Novell took so much heat for not printing it that they put it in the Read Me file.

The reason I include multiple jumps is that the first time through the file, WordPerfect checks some formatting information as it goes, after that it remembers most of what it checked. For anyone tempted to inject an 'I can do that instantly on xxx,' I'll throw in the additional test of using the scroll box to go part way through a large file. WordPerfect's times are proportional to the distance through the file. The 'instant' jumps in other programs often go away when you go somewhere other than the beginning or end. Scrolling with the scroll arrows is much too fast to read on the Power Mac. On the IIci, arrow scrolling goes quickly for just text, but gets jumpy or slow when graphics are involved.

In the last review I complained about text entry in a ten column by thirty row table. On the IIci, I can still out type the screen redraw by the time I'm halfway into the table, but the screen redraw is noticeably better than 3.0. (My work-around is to do heavy data entry in tab delimited form, select it all, and convert it to a table with the Text-to-Table function. It only takes a few seconds.) On the 7100, I didn't have to wait for the screen at all.

I've been on a speed binge for a while, and I find myself asking whether this much emphasis on speed makes sense. It may, in that anything distracting will irritate a writer, and lack of speed is distracting. [Indeed! -Adam] Other things are important when considering power and ease of use: consistency of the interface, ease of access to the most often used functions, predictable access to infrequently used features. I've thought for a long time that WordPerfect's creators had a strong design vision. Most of the time I like their design strategy, so I like the program.

What's Present and What's Missing? — The review of 3.0 gives a lot more information about the implementation and features. Almost none of that information has changed in 3.1 – except, of course for items mentioned here.

3 1/2 As A Decimal

I think the biggest negative surprise in 3.1 is that Outlining is still nothing more than flexible paragraph numbering. I guess Marketing figured keeping up with Apple was a bigger plus than waiting for other major feature additions.

The other disappointment is the lack of character-based styles. The way WordPerfect handles paragraph styles pretty much requires that manual formatting changes be avoided if styles are ever edited or different styles applied to existing text. Since the ability to make those changes is supposed to be one of the major advantages of styles, I find WordPerfect's styles not useful enough to bother with often.

WordPerfect now includes Macintosh Easy Open from Apple and Microsoft Word translators from DataViz. You can finally export to Word format. There is also the choice of the built-in or DataViz version of the Word import translator. I think WordPerfect's converter does a better job than DataViz's (on slow save format files – if you have extensive fast saved Word files, the DataViz translator will probably be your only choice). I still have several complaints about the how much cleanup I have to do after importing files from Word. This issue is my biggest nit to pick with WordPerfect. If you're trying to take on the market gorilla, you must be prepared to swing from higher trees.

The Document Experts and clip art that WordPerfect mailed to people sending in their registration cards for 3.0 now come as disk 6 in the upgrade package. I don't know if first time buyers get disk 6 with the rest, or if they still have to register first. The Experts, which you can think of as combining stationery and macros, have become smarter in some cases. The envelope macro (which is a Document Expert run from the Macro menu) allows better control of address offsets from the default margins set up the first time you run the macro. I still have to trick the envelope macro into working properly with my DeskWriter C, but I appreciate the improvements.

Hardware Requirements — WordPerfect 3.1 takes up around 12 MB of disk space on a 68K based Mac, if you include all the fonts, Document Experts, clip art, documentation, and tutorial files included in the package. I use a 3,000K RAM allocation for the program (even on the Power Mac, as long as virtual memory is on or RAM Doubler is in use). Novell claims it will run in 2,000K on a 68K Mac, but I've always found their minimums a bit optimistic.

WordPerfect document files are not svelte. Compression programs can regularly squeeze 75 percent of the space out of WordPerfect files. The Save As dialog box offers a 'WP 3 Compressed' option, but I haven't been able to get it to give me smaller files, despite taking a lot longer to save. I think there is a bug here.

Pricing — Anyone can buy WordPerfect Mac 3.1 for $99 until 31-Jan-95. Upgrades from prior WordPerfect versions are $59. After January 31st, the retail price goes to $395 and upgrades to $69. The upgrades are free to anyone who purchased 3.0a after 15-Aug-94 and until 30-Nov-94. If you do want to take advantage of the free upgrade, be sure to upgrade on or before 30-Nov-94.

All in all, I still like WordPerfect Mac a lot, and I have every intention of using it as my main word processor for the foreseeable future.

Novell Applications Group — 800/451-5151 — 801/225-5000
801/228-5077 (fax) — <[email protected]> (support)

Overview
DSD Master introduces, for the first time, a new file format which we term 'Hybrid-DSD'. This is a file format which looks to the world exactly like an Apple Lossless (ALAC) PCM file, and functions exactly like one. 'Hybrid-DSD' files can be loaded into iTunes, or into any other player which supports the Apple Lossless format, and will play music like normal. A 'Hybrid-DSD' file contains a PCM copy of the DSD original. However, it also contains the original DSD data, encoded within the file in such a way that iTunes and other players won't attempt to read it. If BitPerfect is asked to play this file, it is able to read both the PCM and the DSD versions. If your DAC supports DSD, then BitPerfect will automatically play the DSD version, otherwise it will automatically play the PCM version. BitPerfect 2.0 and later is required to support this feature. All other playback software will only ever play the PCM version.
Why do we need a Hybrid-DSD file?
Good question! The main reason is to allow BitPerfect users to play DSD files. BitPerfect has for a long time now had the capability to play DSD, but since iTunes does not support DSD there is no way to load DSD files into iTunes. As is the case with FLAC files, if you cannot load it into iTunes, then there is no way to get BitPerfect to play it.

Other players have approached this problem with the use of proxy files. This is a file which typically looks like an Apple Lossless file, so it can be loaded into iTunes, but contains digital silence, of a duration corresponding to the duration of the DSD file. It also contains data telling the player the location of the original DSD file, which it can then load and play. These proxy files do work just fine, but they have some drawbacks which go against BitPerfect's sense of how an App should function.
The proxy file drawback that we dislike the most, is that if you try to play the file through a non DSD-compliant DAC, all you will hear is silence. This means that if you want to play your music through both DSD-compliant and non DSD-compliant DACs, you have to load both the DSD originals (using proxies) and the PCM versions as separate entities. Then you need to establish a method to identify which is which within iTunes, bearing in mind while doing so the capabilities of the DAC you have chosen to play through. At BitPerfect we believe that when you navigate through your music library, you should not be faced with multiple versions of your music, each labelled for a different purpose. You shouldn't have to remember what all these versions are and what they all do. You should not need to be an expert in the playback capabilities of each audio device that you might want to play your music through. We believe that the software should be able to do all that for you, with the minimum of driving skill required of the user. Hybrid-DSD files (and the 2.0 update of BitPerfect) have been developed with this purpose in mind.
Using

Bitperfect 3 1 200

DSD Master's Hybrid-DSD files, you can load into your player a single file which seamlessly switches between the DSD and PCM content according to the capabilities of your DAC and your player software. It has the further advantage that with DSD Master's proprietary PCM conversion algorithm, when listening to the PCM version you will enjoy the best possible PCM sound quality. All we ask of you is that you learn to operate iTunes. We think most audiophiles' cohabiting technophobes will have few - if any - problems with that.
How will I recognize my Hybrid-DSD files?
BitPerfect's new Hybrid-DSD files look like Apple Lossless files. In fact, strictly speaking, since they adhere fully to the Apple Lossless file specification, they ARE Apple Lossless files! For that reason, when DSD Master creates a Hybrid-DSD file it gives it a filename with '.DSDh' inserted between the original file name and the '.m4a' extension:
The '.DSDh' has no other function than to enable you to recognize Hybrid-DSD files at a glance, and differentiate them from regular Apple Lossless files. If you like, you can edit the file name to remove the '.DSDh', and this will have no impact whatsoever on its performance or behavior.

What about the PCM content?
Bitperfect

Bitperfect 3 1 2

When creating a Hybrid-DSD file, BitPerfect gives you the option of the full range of available sample rates for the PCM content, from 44.1kHz all the way up to 384kHz. You can choose whichever one you prefer, whether from the perspective of audio quality, DAC compatibility, or file size. Except for 44.1kHz which is dithered down to 16-bits, all formats maintain a 24-bit bit depth.
We recommend that the very best sound quality will be achieved using one of the 44.1kHz family of sample rates (44.1kHz, 88.2kHz, 176.4kHz, 352.8kHz). However, only the the very finest audio equipment will be able to resolve the audible differences between those sample rates and the 48kHz family (48kHz, 96kHz, 192kHz, 384kHz). [For the technically curious among you, this arises because the sample rate of DSD is precisely 64 times 44.1kHz, whereas it is an awkward 58.8 times 48kHz. 64 is an integer power of 2 - this allows the mathematics underlying the sample rate conversion algorithm to be slightly 'cleaner'.]
Your choice of PCM sample rate will involve a trade-off between sound quality and file size. Using Light Harmonic's amazing Da Vinci DAC (by a substantial margin the best we have ever heard), which can operate natively at up to 384kHz, it is our observation that incremental improvements in sound quality can be achieved, albeit with rapidly diminishing returns, all the way up to 352.8kHz. However, in the real world, your best choice for sample rate (based purely on sound quality) will normally be either 176.4kHz or 88.2kHz, depending on the quality and capabilities of your primary non DSD-compliant DAC. File size considerations may, however, be equally important factors in your particular situation.




broken image